CLIMBING MOUNT SINAI : NOAH ABLETT
1883-1935
By Robert Turnbull
Socialist History Society. 66 pages. £4.00. ISBN 978-0-9930104-5-3
Reviewed by Jim Burns

Apart from a few academics interested in labour history, does anyone
now know who Noah Ablett was?
And, for that matter, how many people really have an idea
what syndicalism is (or was?)? These are reasonable questions to ask
at a time when most major labour-intensive industries have
disappeared, and union membership has fallen dramatically,
along with large-scale union militancy.
Noah Ablett was a South Wales
miner, a working-class autodidact who was active in the coalfields
of his native country, primarily in the years before and after the
First World War. Born in 1883 he started work in the mines when he
was twelve, though he soon nursed ambitions to quit “the dangers and
hard work of mining”. A love of reading and self-education gave him
an opportunity to go to Ruskin College
in Oxford,
where he encountered not only Marxism but the ideas of Daniel De
Leon, the American agitator who had been associated with the
Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) but had left that organisation
and become prominent in the Socialist Labour Party (SLP).
It isn’t surprising that an American should have an influence on
British radicalism. Works published by Charles H. Kerr, the
Chicago-based publisher were available in relatively cheap editions
in the United Kingdom.
One of the interesting aspects of Robert Turnbull’s small book is
that he provides details about the Kerr company, along with
information about the miners’ libraries that could be found in the
pit villages and which provided a basis for people like Ablett and
other working-class activists.
When he left Ruskin, where the educational programme, largely
designed to prepare “working men for a career in public
administration”, had left him dissatisfied, he returned to work as a
checkweighman at Mardy colliery. He helped start the Plebs League
(PL) and the Central Labour College (CLC) as an alternative to
Ruskin. He continued to promote syndicalism, and helped write a
pamphlet, The Miners’ Next
Step, which achieved a degree of notoriety for advocating the
take-over of the mines by a general strike, if necessary. It also
contained an attack on the leaders of the South Wales Miners
Federation (SWMF) who Ablett and others
considered far too moderate in their relationship with the coal
owners. Ablett was involved with the Unofficial Reform Committee
(URC) which wanted to inject fresh blood into the SWMF.
Syndicalism as a theory inspiring action probably had its hey-day in
the three or four years leading up to 1914. There were strikes and
general industrial unrest in Dublin, Hull, Liverpool,
Manchester, and other towns and cities. and
especially in South Wales. The
rapid industrialisation in the area as coal mines spread along the
Rhondda valley led to it sometimes being referred to as “American
Wales” (see Aneurin Bevan and
the World of South Wales by Dai Smith,
University
of Wales Press,
1993). Turnbull has a couple of particularly telling quotes, one
describing the Rhondda valley as it was in 1847 (“the gem of
Glamorganshire”) and the other the squalor (“the whole length of the
valley has been transformed”) to be seen sixty years later.
The working and social conditions were not dissimilar to those found
in industrial parts of the United States, and the same sort of harsh
relationship between workers and employers was also in evidence.
There was a great deal of violence involved when pickets battled
with police, and in Tonypandy in 1911 a riot occurred which included
looting of shops and one death and many serious injuries among both
strikers and police. The military were called out, though mostly on
a stand-by role in the event of the police being unable to contain
the situation.
One of the difficulties that arises when writing about syndicalism
is that it’s often never clearly defined. And it’s sometimes used
almost alternately with the term industrial unionism. Bob Holton in
his British Syndicalism
1900-1914 (Pluto Press, 1976, and rightly referred to by
Turnbull as still the best book on the subject) says, “Industrial
unionism was by no means equivalent to syndicalism, being quite
compatible with a more efficient reformism”.
Both wanted to incorporate all workers in an industry into
one big union, irrespective of what they actually did, and
eventually have all of the industrial unions combined into one
organisation. But industrial unionists were not against co-operating
with those who believed in parliamentary democracy, whereas Ablett
had what Turnbull says was “an ambiguous attitude towards Parliament
and politics”. It can be added that he also had an ambiguous
relationship towards the Communist Party, which began to have a
wider influence among miners after the Russian Revolution. He was
never a Party member.
The shock of thousands of workers rallying to their various
countries’ flags when war broke out in 1914 affected Ablett, though
he continued to play a part in union affairs, and to put forward
syndicalist ideas, though they were hardly likely to reach a
sympathetic audience. He was further disappointed when, in 1921, the
Triple Alliance of transport workers, railway employees, and miners
fell apart, and the miners were left to stand alone when faced with
wage cuts and unemployment. The failure of the General Strike of
1926, when the miners were once again left to strike until driven
back to work by poverty and despair, and Ablett was arrested on a
charge of sedition, was another blow to his belief in working-class
solidarity.
Ablett had always been a heavy drinker, and his final years were
marked by a decline into alcoholism which caused him to become
unreliable when it came to attending meetings and the like He died
in 1935 from cancer.
Turnbull has done a decent job of re-creating Ablett’s life and work
despite what seems to be a paucity of personal material. He was
married and had two children, but left only one or two fragments of
autobiography. And there are memories of him in books and articles
written by some of his contemporaries, along with newspaper reports
of speeches he made. The
Miners’ Next Step was, perhaps, the one thing he’s mostly
remembered for, though I have seen it suggested that its influence
outside a few activists may have been limited. Turnbull would
probably not agree with such an assessment, and is of the opinion
that it “may have been utopian in its intent and revolutionary in
its ambitions, but as a statement of what could be achieved through
class unity and industrial solidarity, it had and continues to have
few equals”.
A response to that could be
that the strikers who picketed and sometimes rioted were more likely
persuaded by immediate concerns about pay and conditions than
theories about syndicalism, industrial unionism, or socialism. They
could sometimes be aroused by a fiery speech from a syndicalist, but
how many later recalled what it was about beyond an attack on the
bosses? This is a contentious area for discussion, but raising false
hopes with notions of “class unity and industrial solidarity”
doesn’t make for worthwhile consideration of a situation.
Climbing Mount Sinai
is a useful addition to the library of material about labour
history. Robert Turnbull has clearly dug deep to find facts about
Ablett’s career. And he recommends a number of other books about Wales, the SWMF
and related subjects.
|