HARD-BOILED HOLLYWOOD:
CRIME AND PUNISHMENT IN POSTWAR LOS ANGELES
By Jon Lewis
University
of California
Press. 233 pages. £24.95. ISBN 978-0-520-28432-6
Reviewed by Jim Burns

Los Angeles
in the post-1945 period was a city in transition. The population
increased from 3.2 million in 1940 to nearly 7.8 million in 1960. To
accommodate all these people there was a boom in property
development, much of it in an unregulated way. Established and newly
developed neighbourhoods sat alongside empty spaces waiting for
developers to move in. Jon Lewis quotes Mike Davis, who in his
classic City of Quartz,
said that Los Angeles
“was first and foremost the creature of real-estate capitalism”.
Cities always attract transients. men and women
passing through, sometimes staying and forming a subculture
around cheap hotels and shabby rooms. If they work, they are in
low-paying jobs and often need to boost their earnings in various
ways. The film industry drew in people from across the
United States, and in particular the young who
were lured to Hollywood because of the
glamour that seemed to be attached to it. Magazines devoted to the
lives of the stars wrote about parties, night clubs, big cars, fancy
clothes, the promise of fabulous earnings. A beautiful young girl or
a handsome young boy living in a small town in the Midwest, say,
looked at their humdrum lives, and
dreamed of getting to Los Angeles and being “discovered” by a
talent scout. After all, the magazines described how it had happened
that way for more than one hopeful arrival.
It wasn’t true, of course, or at least not in most cases, and as a
consequence the city was full of young people eking out a living as
waitresses, bell-hops, garage attendants, shop assistants, and
anything else that would provide the basics while they attempted to
find a way into films. For the women, the “anything else” might
include posing for pin-up photos or perhaps outright pornography,
and even, in some cases, sleeping with men who could have
connections in the film studios. Visiting the bars, restaurants, and
other places where they gathered became a routine. The problem was
that the studios were in a state of decline. Attendances at cinemas
were falling, the tie-up where studios also controlled cinemas so
could dictate what was shown and where and when, was breaking down,
and there were labour troubles. Hollywood still spelled
excitement and success to many people, but all was not well beneath
the glossy surface. Star-struck youngsters “imagined a place that no
longer existed”.
It wasn’t only men with links to the studios who could be found in
bars and night clubs. Los
Angeles had a sizeable collection of
gangsters of various kinds, not to mention oddballs who preyed on
impressionable women, young or old. A woman alone, or with a
like-minded friend, might soon be picked up, and there was no
assurance that the man involved was not dangerous. But the chance of
a way into films, or even just a few free drinks and a meal, was
sometimes enough for her to be less than careful about what she was
getting into.
In January, 1947, a local housewife saw a woman’s corpse on some
waste ground. What was particularly chilling about her death was
that the body had been cut in half and also bore evidence of other
grotesque mutilations. Needless to say, the
Los Angeles newspapers (there were several at
that time) had a field day reporting what became known as the “Black
Dahlia” murder. The woman was soon identified as Elizabeth Short,
aged twenty-two, and originally from a small town in
Massachusetts. She had lived at various
addresses in Los Angeles,
usually sharing with other women, and was known to participate in
what is referred to as a “sleazy bar culture”, while trying to find
a way into films. Jon Lewis says that she “may well have been the
victim of a bad bar hook-up”.
The Black Dahlia case was never solved, though a selection of
suspects came and went over the years. And there were several other
similar incidents of women being killed and their bodies dumped
where they were easily found. None of them seems to have captured
the imagination of the press and public in the same way that Short’s
death did. The very nature of her death and the mutilation of her
body probably kept curiosity alive, though there may also have been
a certain amount of lack of interest in later murders due to Los Angeles “earning a reputation as America’s
reigning capital of weird crimes”. It was a reputation that was
matched by it also being a city “where the style and content of
criminal activity reflected the many competing and in many cases
oddball subcultures taking root there”.
In an aside, Lewis looks at a small group that clustered around the
Surrealist artist and photographer, Man Ray, during his time in Los Angeles. The group
included Henry Miller, John Huston, Max Ernst, Edward G. Robinson,
and others. There is no suggestion that any of these people had
anything to do with the Black Dahlia case, but in what might be just
a curious coincidence, a 1945 photo of a reclining woman by Man Ray
shows her with her arms above her head in the same way that the
murderer had positioned the body, or the upper part of it, of
Elizabeth Short.
Years later, a retired homicide detective, Steve Hodel, alleged that
his father, a Doctor George Hodel, had killed Elizabeth Short.
George Hodel had been a friend of Man Ray. Lewis draws attention to
the “exquisite corpse” parlour game in which Surrealist artists
“reassembled and reconfigured cut-up images of naked woman”. He
refers to works by Dali, Magritte, and Ernst which have a “distinct
visual correspondence between the stylised depiction of the female
body in these Surrealist artworks and the crime signature of the
Black Dahlia killer; the horrible mutilation of the corpse, the
carefully posed and sectioned body left by the side of the road”.
I remember seeing an exhibition in Paris some years ago, in which the subject was
sex and Surrealism, and being challenged by some of the images
displayed. The distorted dolls by Hans Bellmer were particularly
disturbing. Was it possible that George Hodel, said by Lewis to be a
specialist in sexual diseases who had a police record as the
possible killer of another woman, though he was never charged, was a
frustrated Surrealist who acted out his
creative fantasies with Elizabeth Short’s body?
Girls like Short inevitably came into contact with criminals as they
toured the bars, and the presence in Los Angeles
of gangsters such as Benjamin “Bugsy” Siegel and Mickey Cohen was
well-known to both the police and many people in
Hollywood. The film industry needed money all
the time and, the Mob invested in the studios. The result was: “In a
relationship business like Hollywood’s, business relationships easily
morph into social relationships, so much so that by the mid-1930s
mobsters, moguls, and movie stars commingled frequently and often
carelessly”.
Lewis also points to gangsters and film industry workers crossing
paths “at nightclubs, bars, clandestine gambling establishments, and
private parties after the war. The private and professional could
and often did overlap at these sites, where interactions and
relationships were complicated by alcohol and illicit drugs, human
trafficking (prostitution) and the occasional `badger’ or blackmail
plot that might accompany sexual procurement and indulgence, as well
as the frequent
exchange of cash and credit at card, dice, and roulette tables”.
Criminals were also involved in the “organisation of the movie
industry’s labour force,” especially when it came to anything
concerning trucks and truckers. The Teamsters ran everything in that
line and were Mob controlled. The Conference of Studio Unions (CSU),
which represented craftsmen, technicians, and the like, had backing
from the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners, a union
firmly in the grip of the Mob. In 1945 there was a violent strike at
Warner Brothers when the CSU clashed with the International Alliance
of Theatrical and Stage Employees (IATSE) which had Willie Bioff and
George Browne in its leadership. Both were “gangsters and fervent
anti-communists”. Herb Sorrell, head of CSU, was said to be a
communist, though he denied that he was, but with anti-communism
coming into fashion, it made sense to smear him that way. The studio
bosses, faced with dealing with Sorrell, or co-operating with the
gangsters, chose the latter as the safest option. They didn’t want
to appear to be pro-communist. Journalists who covered labour
relations in the studios were aware of the management/Mob
connections, but thought it wiser not to write about them.
The dangers of getting too close to gangsters were highlighted in
the case of Jean Spangler, a film extra (she had a small role in
Young Man with a
Horn, a film featuring
Kirk Douglas and Doris Day and supposedly based loosely on the life
of Bix Beiderbecke), who got involved with “Little” Davy Ogul, an
associate of crime boss, Mickey Cohen. Spangler, like Elizabeth
Short, had dreams of “making it” in
Hollywood, and thought that Ogul could
introduce her to the right people. But she seems to have got caught
up in some sort of feud between Cohen and another gangster, Ignazio
Dragna. He hired a killer called Johnny Rosselli to get rid of
Spangler, who it was said had been working with Ogul to blackmail
well-known men she’d slept with. Spangler’s body was never found.
It’s of interest to note that Rosselli was a friend of Harry Cohn,
the chief executive of Columbia Pictures. This doesn’t suggest that
Cohn knew anything about Spangler’s disappearance, but it does
illustrate how some Hollywood
moguls had cosy relationships with gangsters.
There is so much packed into
Hard-Boiled Hollywood that it’s a temptation to carry on quoting
from it. The role played by gossip columnists like Hedda Hopper and
Louella Parsons is scrutinised, as is that of the magazine
Confidential, which under
the guise of performing a service by informing the public about the
misdemeanours of their favourite stars, made money by agreeing to
withhold stories if they were paid enough. Crime was widespread.
There was corruption among the police in Los Angeles, and if an honest cop got too
close to anyone important he would warned off by one or other of his
superiors.
There are sad stories, too, stemming from a milieu where, as Lewis
says, “young women have always been disposable commodities in the
movie business”. The saga of Barbara Payton’s brief time in the sun
and her decline into alcoholism and an early death is an example.
She had featured in supporting roles in films like
Trapped (with Lloyd
Bridges), Kiss Tomorrow
Goodbye (with James Cagney), and
Only the Valiant (with
Gregory Peck), and seemed to be headed for a reasonably-successful
career in films. But she was known as “a notorious
Hollywood
party girl who had been for the past few years hitching her star,
such as it was, to a series of wealthy and famous men”. She got
involved with the established actor Franchot Tone, many years her
senior, but was also having an affair with a minor player named Tom
Neal. The outcome was a public brawl between Tone and Neal which put
the older man in hospital, and inevitably was widely reported in the
scandal magazines and elsewhere.
Payton’s career began to slide. She was in England in 1953,
desperately trying to make a fresh start with roles in a couple of
Hammer “B” films, and on her return to America picked up work in a
few independent productions. Her final screen credit was in
Murder is my Beat,
described by Lewis as “a cheapie noir”. It was directed by Edgar
Ulmer, who has become something of a cult figure among film noir
enthusiasts, but hardly rates as a film masterpiece. After that, it
was downhill all the way for Payton until, in 1967, she was found
destitute, drunk, and near-death, at the rear of some shops in Los Angeles. The refuse collectors who came
across her thought it was an old woman lying there, but she was just
thirty-nine, and had been working as a prostitute. She died a couple
of months later, forgotten by just about everyone.
Marilyn Monroe crops up as another casualty, and Lewis looks into
the conspiracy theories surrounding her curious demise. Was it
murder, suicide, an accident? With a cast of politicians (Robert
Kennedy), mobsters (including Jimmy Hoffa, head of the Teamsters
union), film people (what did Peter Lawford know?), and many others,
it’s a story likely to run forever. There was even a CIA agent who,
on his deathbed, claimed to have carried out an order to kill
Monroe
and make it look like she’d taken her own life.
As part of his investigation into Hollywood
post-1945, Lewis considers three films which, he says, reflect on
what was happening to an industry that was changing.
Sunset Boulevard angered
studio executives with its cynical view of Hollywood’s past glories
and its present problems, In
a Lonely Place looked into seedy corners of life in the film
capital, and The Big Knife
focused on how crimes could be committed and covered up when a
star’s career was at stake. Based on a bitter play by the
HUAC-hounded Clifford Odets, it also had something to say, albeit in
an oblique way, about the blacklists.
Hard-Boiled Hollywood
is obviously a dark survey of some of the less-salubrious aspects of
the Hollywood story. There were, no
doubt, more than a few hard-working, quiet-living actors, writers,
directors, and others involved in the many fine films that came out
of Hollywood in the years after 1945, whose names
never got into the newspapers and magazines. But, as Hedda Hopper
said, “Nobody’s interested in sweetness and light”.
|