THE PARTY IS ALWAYS RIGHT : THE
UNTOLD STORY OF GERRY HEALY AND BRITISH TROTSKYISM
By Aidan Beatty
Pluto Press. 214 pages. £16.99. ISBN 978-0-7453-4872-8
Reviewed by Jim Burns
Years ago, when “alternative” bookshops flourished in many towns and cities,
I enjoyed sifting through the racks of newspapers and magazines published by
the various left-wing groups then active. The Trotskyist publications
particularly caught my attention, not because I was attracted to their ideas
but more because they often seemed to be at war with each other, rather than
with the capitalist system. I couldn’t help wondering just what, if
anything, they were ever likely to achieve in terms of a substantial
membership when a tendency to purge, split and create new small parties kept
them forever struggling to survive. As a regular contributor to the weekly
Tribune, and an occasional
contributor to more-obscure titles like
The Industrial Unionist and
Workers Opposition, I could
sympathise with most people on the Left of the political divide, at least in
principle, but the bickering and hostility between the supposed “comrades”,
coupled with the retreat into theory rather than practice,
inclined me to think that the Trotskyists were eventually doomed to,
if not extinction, then irrelevance.
Aidan Beatty’s well-researched and readable history of the rise and fall of
one Trotskyist group and its leader may well stand to encapsulate many of
the problems common to all similar organisations. But one thing does perhaps
make it different. Gerry Healy didn’t only dominate the Workers
Revolutionary Party (WRP). He appears to have been able for a long time to
get away with a catalogue of violence and sexual abuse that, in normal
circumstances, would have brought about a reaction not only from his
victims, but also from the
supposedly enlightened fellow-members of the party. That the reaction only
occurred after many years says a great deal about the nature of the control
that Healy exercised over those he led.
Healy was born in 1913 in Galway, Ireland, but was always vague about his
early days and claimed that they were “poverty-stricken”. In fact, Beatty
says, his family was relatively well-off and owned a 109-acre farm. Healy
also claimed to have seen his father killed by the Black and Tans during the
Irish War of Independence, a lie he could get away with because the British
left tended to be largely ignorant of Irish history. He left Ireland when he
was 14 to train as a ship’s radio operator in Britain. How long he spent at
sea isn’t known, and many other facts relating to Healy’s life need to be
treated with caution. He may have joined the Young Communist League when he
was 18, but “The first definite record of him being a member of the
Communist Party was not until 1936”. He was, initially, a loyal communist,
but in 1937 switched his allegiance to the Trotskyists. It’s not my
intention to provide a detailed account of what Trotskyism added up to.
Beatty sums up its basic difference to Stalinism : “In opposition to the
Stalinist position that the USSR should develop Socialism in One Country,
Trotskyists advocated Permanent Revolution in which Communism would be
spread rapidly and globally”.
There was more to it than that, but this isn’t the place to go into all the
factors that differentiated Trotskyism from Stalinist communism.
Beatty additionally refers to the problems facing small groups like the
Trotskyists who can do little to shape events : “Without any practical ways
to settle debates, by actually putting them into practice, theoretical
debates take precedence. Trotskyist groups often exist in a world of theory,
with little in the way of practice”. It’s
worth noting what Beatty says about a Scottish Trotskyist named Jock Haston,
who claimed to have “won Healy over to the Trotskyist movement”.
He had been a merchant seaman and
helped to distribute socialist literature in Nazi Germany, “but was expelled
from the Communist Party in 1934 after questioning Soviet trade links with
the Third Reich”. According to
Beatty, some of what Healy claimed were his experiences while in the
merchant navy were too close for comfort to Halston’s.
Healy worked in factories during the Second World War, and married Betty
Russell, a secretary and teacher and a one-time member of the Communist
Party. Without going too much into the ins and outs of Trotskyists
groupings, which tend to be of interest only to those obsessed with such
matters, the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) was formed in 1944, and
within it Healy pushed for a policy of entryism into the Labour Party in
order to gain new recruits for
Trotskyism. Not everyone agreed with him and his faction became known as
“The Club”. Beatty is of the
opinion that this marks the point where Healy began to become a leading
light of British Trotskyism. And soon started to display “authoritarian
tendencies”.
I’m moving events along quickly to avoid becoming bogged down in factional
disputes and the like. It was in the 1950s that Healy and other members of
“The Club” were expelled from the Labour Party.
In response, and “adding to the
Trotskyist alphabet soup, the Socialist Labour League (SLL] was born”.
Again, fast-forwarding takes us to the early-1970s when Healy was able to
bring a number of what would be called “celebrities” to
the “debating parties” held in homes around London. They included the
playwrights Jim Allen and David Mercer, the filmmaker Ken Loach, and the
actor Corin Redgrave. Some were impressed by Healy’s seeming command of
Marxist and Trotskyist ideology, others less so.
But, for Healy, these gatherings were a handy way of raising funds : “When
Corin Redgrave joined the party, Healy allegedly told party members that he
still needed to recruit Vanessa, Corin’s sister, and the wealthier of the
two : ‘it’s the big one I’m interested in, the one with the money’ “. The
SLL started to pick up new members, and “Healy rebranded it in July 1973 as
the Workers Revolutionary Party” : “it was now a true vanguard party in the
Leninist mould, one that would lead the British working classes to victory
in the looming terminal crisis of capitalism”. The WRP was to be the high
point of Healy’s political life, and is where the story of his downfall also
begins.
Beatty’s detailed account of events and personalities within the orbit of
the WRP can be quite fascinating, but also disturbing. Healy maintained a
strict control and expected his followers (disciples might be a better word)
to carry out their duties, such as running the party’s office, selling its
papers, raising funds, and more, for little or no pay. If they failed, he
raged, and it wasn’t unknown for him to physically assault anyone who
offended him. One of the more shocking stories is of him breaking a chair
over the back of his secretary,
Aileen Jennings, “an action that was hushed up at the time”, but left her
with long-lasting spinal injuries. When summer camps took place it was
claimed that violence and intimidation were not unknown as
elements of party discipline.
What is intriguing is how Healy managed to raise money to purchase a
property in Derbyshire where in 1975 he established a College of Marxist
Education. There’s a photo of White Meadow House in the book, and when
adaptations had been carried out it could accommodate up to 60 students.
Local people were told that it was a drama school, which tied in with the
fact of Corin Redgrave being named as the owner. However, the College was
the cause of the WRP receiving the kind of publicity it perhaps didn’t want.
I can remember the furore that arose when the
Daily Mail published articles by
a journalist named Shelley Rohde exposing the true purpose of the activities
at the College. Needless to say, it was all angled to give the impression of
a radical group about to promote a revolution and overthrow the government
of the United Kingdom, something the paper’s readers were probably prepared
to believe. To anyone familiar with the fumblings of minor groups like the
WRP it seemed more like a comedy than a real threat. It did, however, lead
to a police raid on the premises, ostensibly in a search for arms supposedly
hidden there. They did find some bullets but no guns, and there were
suggestions that the bullets may not have been there before the police
arrived.
Healy’s attitude towards women in general had always been of a negative
nature. Beatty says that he saw women as “part of the ‘backward’ elements of
society”, and that he was a “misogynist” and he led groups that “had a set
of profound gender biases”. It
all came to a head when allegations of sexual abuse surfaced in 1985. This
didn’t come as a surprise to some people. Rumours and gossip about Healy’s
activities had circulated for some years, but it took a letter from Aileen
Jennings to the Political Committee of the WRP to bring it out into the open
: “As the letter made clear, Gerry Healy, by then in his early seventies,
was using his position within a profoundly hierarchical and authoritarian
organisation to coerce women, many of them in their twenties, into having
sex with him”. Jennings named 26
women in her letter as “victims of Healy”. There was also a story involving
a 14 year old girl. The result was that he was expelled from the party he
had founded. The front page of the issue of
The News Line, the party
newspaper, dated 30 October 1985, reproduced in the book, has the headline,
“G. Healy’s Expulsion : The Facts”.
It’s interesting to note that, as well as the exposures about Healy’s sexual
misdemeanours, there may have been an undercurrent of criticism about other
matters in circulation. David North, “the leader of the Workers League, the
WRP’s sister party in the United States, had begun to tentatively criticise
Healy’s pseudo-philosophical posturing”. Not that North himself was a
paragon of virtue, if some of the information Beatty supplies about him is
anything to go by. But there is a quote from something written by Mike
Banda, a “Healy loyalist”, that
may give an idea of the “pseudo-philosophical” nonsense that Healy and his
supporters were prone to delivering:
“Dialectical thought concepts are now entering matter through us via the
self-impulse of the universal movement of matter. As this takes place we
arrive at the moment of actuality, which is causality....At this dialectical
moment of causality , the cause (essence) cancels itself into the effect
(abstract thought already posited in us as part of a previous dialectical
process). Likewise the effect cancels itself into the cause”.
Beatty tells us that this gobbledegook is from “a theoretically inflected
attack on the trade unionist
Alan Thornett, pubLished in 1975
just after his expulsion from the WRP”, which makes me think that Thornett
was lucky to have been expelled. Employed in a car factory in Oxford, he may
have been one of the few genuine workers in the Workers Revolutionary Party.
He did continue as a Trotskyist and, inevitably, formed a new party, the
Workers Socialist League (WSL).
Healy’s departure caused a split in the WRP, one that, to quote Beatty, “was
the occasion for a fair amount of financial carpetbagging”. There were
properties involved – among them, the so-called college in Derbyshire, a
printing press in Runcorn, some Youth Training Centres, and more. But “the
generally chaotic and convoluted nature of the party’s finances make it
difficult to know who was actually stealing what”. Some of the people who
were close to Healy – the Redgraves, for example - refused to believe the
accusations made against him. They joined with him in the formation of a new
group, the Marxist Party, claiming it as “an event of international
significance”. In fact, it “remained tiny to the point of insignificance”,
which didn’t stop it functioning true to form: “ Corinna Lot was initially a
member of the Marxist Party but was expelled in November 1990 for
“subjective idealism and then accused of being an agent provocateur”.
Healy died in 1989, though the Marxist Party lasted until 1995 with Corin
Redgrave in charge. He returned to acting, though his years as a member of
the WRP had a negative effect on his career. He died in 2010. Beatty says
that Vanessa Redgrave “seems to have moved away from far-left politics and
generally refuses to discuss her time supporting Healy”. He also notes that
she was awarded an OBE in the January 2022 New Year’s Honours List. She has
“clearly become acceptable to the British Establishment”.
The Party is Always Right
is an absorbing read if you are interested in the ways that corrupt and
devious leaders, swayed by power, can manipulate other people where politics
are concerned. British Trotskyism seems dead or at least totally irrelevant
now, and perhaps Gerry Healy is
partly responsible for it being in that condition?